> On Mar 14, 2016, at 6:41 AM, Daniel Fuchs <daniel.fu...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Hi Mandy, > > On 06/03/16 00:01, Mandy Chung wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >>> On Mar 4, 2016, at 8:05 AM, Daniel Fuchs <daniel.fu...@oracle.com> wrote: >>> >>> Please find below a patch for: >>> >>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151281 >>> 8151281: Module java.httpclient could use System.Logger >>> instead of PlatformLogger >>> >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8151281/webrev.00/ >> >> >> I’m happy to see usage of PlatformLogger being converted to System.Logger. >> >> Is there any reason why Log can’t be a concrete implementation class? > > It could but it would still be a bit artificial and would add an > extra call layer in the call stack. I considered it but opted for > the simpler solution. >
It’s a nice trick. Perhaps define a new internal class that implements System.Logger with default methods. Any platform classes want itself to be skipped will extend that new internal class? Mandy
