All I can say is thank you ;-) I can confirm that it works here to.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Langer, Christoph <christoph.lan...@sap.com> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > I had already created a bug report for this: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158170 in the meanwhile but > unfortunately, by mistake, I had just sent this information to Doychin and > not to the mailing list. So, feel free to close and mark my bug as > duplicate. > > I also started work on testing Doychin's approach but did not yet find > time to finish it - so you overtook me on that one also. > > As for AIX, there is no getifaddrs available. So there we have to stick to > the ioctl approach. > > I'll take a deeper look next week. > > Best regards > Christoph > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: net-dev [mailto:net-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of > Chris > > Hegarty > > Sent: Donnerstag, 2. Juni 2016 14:06 > > To: Doychin Bondzhev <doyc...@dsoft-bg.com>; OpenJDK Network Dev list > > <net-dev@openjdk.java.net> > > Subject: 8158519: Incorrect network mask and broadcast address on Linux > > when there are multiple IPv4 addresses on an interface > > > > Doychin, et al, > > > > I finally got time to look at the issue you reported and your suggested > patch. I > > filed > > 8158519 [1] to track the issue. I think your suggested patch may be ok, > but I just > > wanted to push on the ioctl approach. I found an alternative, and > verified that it > > works as expected. Please take a look, and verify in your environment. > Then > > we > > need to weigh up the two separate approaches. > > > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8158519.00/ > > > > For the record, I don’t have any specific issue with using getifaddrs, I > just > > wanted to > > see if there was a less invasive change. That said, using getifaddrs > could lead to > > cleaner code, but we would need to check the situation on AIX ( which I > don’t > > have > > access to ). > > > > -Chris. > > > > [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158519 >
