Thanks guys! I requested a fix for jdk9. Lets see how that goes.
Best Regards, Thomas On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Vyom Tewari <vyom.tew...@oracle.com> wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > fix look good to me, but i am not jdk10 reviewer. > > Thanks, > > Vyom > > > On Tuesday 16 May 2017 06:20 PM, Thomas Stüfe wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> may I have a review for this tiny fix: >> >> Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8180424 >> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stuefe/webrevs/8180424-another- >> build-issue-on-aix-after-8034174/webrev.00/webrev/ < >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Estuefe/webrevs/8180424-anothe >> r-build-issue-on-aix-after-8034174/webrev.00/webrev/> >> >> The prototypes for NET_RecvFrom and NET_Accept do not match their >> implementations for AIX since 8034174. This did not lead to an error in >> jdk9 because there, the header (net_util_md.h) was not included by >> aix_close.c. In JDK10, it is included and therefore does not build. >> >> I believe this did not lead to a runtime error on jdk9, at least not for >> the typical values involved; the mismatch is between int* and unsigned int* >> (native socklen_t). >> >> Kind Regards, Thomas >> > >
