Why assume something that sophisticated where it can be adequately explained by a simpler thing? :) I bet it was an IDE inspection.
-Pavel > On 8 Apr 2020, at 14:14, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote: > > On 08/04/2020 14:07, Daniel Fuchs wrote: >> Hi Pavel, >> >> On 08/04/2020 13:56, David Holmes wrote: >>> and `@exception` tags for checked exceptions that were neither thrown >>> nor imported >> >> Hopefully that's only on internal classes. > From a quick scan, the changes are to internal classes and a few non-public > elements of public API classes. So I don't think anything should impact the > javadoc. I'm guessing this patch is motivated by something creating that is > running the javadoc tool with different options to what the "docs" target > uses. > > -Alan
