On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 15:06:49 GMT, Daniel Fuchs <dfu...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> I've created an issue to track this: >>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8269288 >> >> Thanks. So are you keeping the Objects.requireNonNull here? If so then it >> should probably be the 2-arg version so that the message is clear that the >> custom DatagramSocketFactory returned null, otherwise it will look like a DS >> bug. > > @AlanBateman Ah - good idea - something like "implementation returned by > installed DatagramSocketFactoryImpl is null"? > Maybe we could add the name of the concrete DatagramSocketFactoryImpl class > too? OK. I've added a message to the null check now. See 36bcee3 ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4574
