On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 10:45:22 GMT, Daniel Jeliński <djelin...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Please review this trivial fix for setting "Expect" header.
> 
> The original code added a new header every time. As a result, when the 
> request was retried, it was sent with two Expect headers.
> The new code replaces the original Expect header instead of adding a new one.
> 
> Expect header allows only one value, "100-continue", so there's no risk of 
> overwriting some other value.
> 
> No new test. I added the bug ID to the test that was intermittently failing 
> because of this issue. Existing tests continue to pass.
> 
> Also fixed an unintentional passthrough in `switch` case that generated 
> duplicate logs in tests.

LGTM
I wonder if the switch statement should be converted to use the newer switch 
syntax. Up to you!

    switch (x) {
        case A -> { }
        case B -> { }
    }

-------------

Marked as reviewed by dfuchs (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13224#pullrequestreview-1362848935

Reply via email to