On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 10:05:10 GMT, Claes Redestad <[email protected]> wrote:
> While I lean towards being wary, I think there are definitely things in here > that is worth pursuing. > > For example it seems profitable to avoid allocating and appending to a > `StringBuilder` for the case where we end up returning the original `String`, > so perhaps this would be better implemented using a fast-path loop: Yes that's what I was trying to say in my first comment. I would be fine with keeping that part of the proposed changes. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15354#issuecomment-1691419336
