On Sat, 23 Sep 2023 17:28:55 GMT, Aleksei Efimov <[email protected]> wrote:

>> ### Summary 
>> 
>> The changes in this PR add new API to `java.net.InetAddress`, 
>> `java.net.Inet4Address`, and
>>  `java.net.Inet6Address` classes to parse IP address literals:
>>  ```
>> method public static java.net.InetAddress 
>> java.net.InetAddress.ofLiteral(java.lang.String)
>> method public static java.net.Inet4Address 
>> java.net.Inet4Address.ofLiteral(java.lang.String)
>> method public static java.net.InetAddress 
>> java.net.Inet6Address.ofLiteral(java.lang.String)
>> ``` 
>> 
>> ### How new methods differ from existing ones
>> 
>> These methods differ from `InetAddress.getByName` and 
>> `InetAddress.getAllByName` in the following ways:
>> 1. If a string supplied is not an address literal it is not forwarded to the 
>> system-wide resolver, but IllegalArgumentException is thrown instead. The 
>> system-wide resolver is never called from these new methods.
>> 2. No reverse lookup is performed to resolve a hostname for the supplied 
>> address literal - the `InetAddress[46 ]` instances returned by the new 
>> `ofLiteral` API has no hostname set.
>> 3. Each `ofLiteral` static method returns addresses of its class only. It 
>> gives the ability to check if an IP address literal is of a specific address 
>> type. 
>> 
>> ### The list of noteworthy changes
>> - `IPv4-mapped IPv6 address` and `IPv4-compatible IPv6 addresses` require 
>> some special handling in the new API to implement all supported IP address 
>> types.  
>> - All address literal parsing code has been moved from 
>> `InetAddress.getAllByName` to address type-specific 
>> `Inet4Address.parseAddressString` and `Inet6Address.parseAddressString` 
>> methods.
>> - The text with scoped IPv6 addresses architecture draft IETF file has been 
>> replaced from `[draft-ietf-ipngwg-scoping-arch-04.txt]` to reference `RFC 
>> 4007: IPv6 Scoped Address Architecture`. The "RFC 4007" has been also added 
>> as `@ spec` into Inet6Address class-level Javadoc.
>> 
>> ### Testing 
>> 
>> `jdk-tier1`, `jdk-tier2`, and `jdk-tier3` test sets show no failure with the 
>> changes.
>> 
>> `java/net` JCK tests are failing with new methods added failure (CSR is 
>> planned for this change):
>> 
>> Added Methods
>> -------------
>> 
>> java.net.Inet4Address:                  method public static 
>> java.net.Inet4Address java.net.Inet4Address.ofLiteral(java.lang.String)
>> java.net.Inet6Address:                  method public static 
>> java.net.InetAddress java.net.Inet6Address.ofLiteral(java.lang.String)
>> java.net.InetAddress:                   method public static 
>> java.net.InetAddress java.net.InetAddress.ofLiteral(java.lan...
>
> Aleksei Efimov has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional 
> commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - updates for Inet6Address.ofLiteral return type, javadoc and the regression 
> test
>  - add null checks and NPE to methods javadoc

To restart the conversation around the method name, I've prepared the following 
table with a list of method names discussed during the previous review 
iteration:

| Name | Usage Example | Notes |
|-------|--------------|-------|
| `ofLiteral` | `InetAddress.ofLiteral` | Current version. Cleary conveys it 
takes only an IP literal. Matches its implementation. Good for IDE 
autocompletion. |
| `parse` | `InetAddress.parse` | The fact that only IP address literals are 
taken as a parameter is obscured a bit. But still suggests that the InetAddress 
instance is constructed by parsing some text. Good for IDE.|
| `parseLiteral` | `InetAddress.parseLiteral` | Method name changed to hint 
that an IP address literal is taken as a parameter. Good for IDE. Matches its 
implementation.|
| `getByAddress` | `InetAddress.getByAddress` | Overrides existing method in 
InetAddress, but adds new method to Inet4Address and Inet6Address. Introduces 
new meaning of `address` term - IP address literal string. In existing API the 
`address` means a raw byte array.|

My preference is to follow with one of the following two:
`ofLiteral` or `parseLiteral`.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15775#issuecomment-1747264766

Reply via email to