On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 20:55:40 GMT, 温绍锦 <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> @cl4es and @Glavo have already made some very good optimizations to 
> URLEncoder, but we can continue to improve.
> 
> The current URLEncoder's Predicate for DONT_NEED_ENCODING is based on BitSet, 
> which is actually a table lookup. The actual performance may not be as good 
> as microbench. 
> 
> The character value range of DONT_NEED_ENCODING is between [45-122]. We can 
> construct two long type constants to do the work of BitSet. This can improve 
> performance by about 7% to 30%.

It was recently conceived specifically to help `URLEncoder`, and it was 
implemented as an internal utility to give it time to mature/evolve and to make 
the decision to turn it into a public API independent from getting a quick win 
on JDK-internal code. It seems natural and logical that we keep improving this 
abstraction rather than manually inline the logic into `URLEncoder`.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16082#issuecomment-1752517839

Reply via email to