On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 13:52:57 GMT, Claes Redestad <redes...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Many OpenJDK micros use `@Fork(jvmArgs/-Append/-Prepend)` to add JVM
> reasonable or necessary flags, but when deploying and running micros we often
> want to add or replace flags to tune to the machine, test different GCs, etc.
> The inconsistent use of the different `jvmArgs` options make it error prone,
> and we've had a few recent cases where we've not been testing with the
> expected set of flags.
>
> This PR suggests using `jvmArgs` consistently. I think this aligns with the
> intuition that when you use `jvmArgsAppend/-Prepend` intent is to add to a
> set of existing flags, while if you supply `jvmArgs` intent is "run with
> these and nothing else". Perhaps there are other opinions/preferences, and I
> don't feel strongly about which to consolidate to as long as we do so
> consistently. One argument could be made to consolidate on `jvmArgsAppend`
> since that one is (likely accidentally) the current most popular (143
> compared to 59 `jvmArgsPrepend` and 18 `jvmArgs`).
test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/vm/compiler/overhead/SimpleRepeatCompilation.java
line 98:
> 96:
> 97: @Benchmark
> 98: @Fork(jvmArgs={"-Xbatch",TRIVIAL_MATH_METHOD})
Suggestion:
@Fork(jvmArgs={"-Xbatch", TRIVIAL_MATH_METHOD})
test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/vm/compiler/overhead/SimpleRepeatCompilation.java
line 138:
> 136:
> 137: @Benchmark
> 138: @Fork(jvmArgs={"-Xbatch",LARGE_METHOD})
Suggestion:
@Fork(jvmArgs={"-Xbatch", LARGE_METHOD})
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21683#discussion_r1819745626
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21683#discussion_r1819745805
