On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 06:51:10 GMT, Thomas Stuefe <stu...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > @tstuefe And you also agree that the link should be removed? (Which is what > > this PR is about) > > The 20+ years old link to the PASC error report I would probably remove; it > is likely outdated now. If one wanted to invest the time, one could test the > current behavior on our supported Unices. As long as that is not done, we can > live with setting SIG_DFL manually. Thanks for looking into this Thomas, much appreciated! I think the improvements you suggest here are perhaps streching the scope of this particular PR, which was mostly to update links to use HTTPS. I must also admit that I have a very limited understanding of these low-level Unix APIs, so I'm reluctant to include material changes in this PR. I have filed https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8348183 to track a review/update of the comment in ProcessImpl_md.c and suggest that we simply remove the "unofficial" link for this PR. Would this be ok with you? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21633#issuecomment-2604751323
