On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 12:18:10 GMT, serhiysachkov <[email protected]> wrote:
>> switching to nanoTime as suggested in ticket comments
>
> serhiysachkov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> 8281511: update check timeout logic to take into account lower bound as
> mentioned in review discussion
test/jdk/java/net/ipv6tests/Tests.java line 159:
> 157: dprintln("checkIfTimeOut: got = " + got + " lower bound = " +
> expected);
> 158:
> 159: if (got <= expected) {
I think just < expected ... effectively good timeout is >= specified timeout
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23840#discussion_r1979328790
