On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 18:10:53 GMT, Daniel Fuchs <dfu...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Volkan Yazici has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fix copyright years
>
> src/java.net.http/share/classes/jdk/internal/net/http/websocket/Frame.java
> line 105:
>
>> 103: * The source and the destination buffers may be the same
>> instance.
>> 104: */
>> 105: static void mask(ByteBuffer src, ByteBuffer dst, int mask) {
>
> Ok - I'm going to start painting the bikeshed here. Though I like the name
> `mask`, the fact that there was a method called `mask` before that did
> something completely different makes me pause. Maybe we should not reuse the
> name `mask` here, and either keep `transferMasking` or use a new name like
> `applyMask`. One of my concern is backporting, where `mask` means something
> else in previous releases. We'd have to remember that in one release it means
> something and in the next it means something different.
Here's an undercoat: what does the method so as per its Java doc - its copies
data from one buffer to another applying a mask. Thus copyWithMask, or
transferWithMask
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24033#discussion_r1994143451
