On Thu, 22 May 2025 10:52:44 GMT, Daniel Fuchs <dfu...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Hello Daniel, with this proposed change, is there any reason to have the >> `localSource` field in this `TimeSource` anymore? > > Yes. It avoids the volatile read on nanoSource. It could serve as a safety net. But I can also revert this and add the assert mentioned in the PR description. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25390#discussion_r2102888330
