On Thu, 9 Oct 2025 09:23:59 GMT, Daniel Fuchs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi guys, I would prefer if we handled any changes to the 100 - continue > behaviour in a separate fix. That would be easier to review and to discuss > options. So I'd suggest to revert > [4b00588](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/27069/commits/4b0058886cf10b1703426acc4131453c46636645) > in this PR and possibly discuss that in a followup. I can remove, but if we can neither manually send 100-continue to resolve the issue described by @Michael-Mc-Mahon, or 101-switching protocols as I originally wanted, what exactly does this PR accomplish? The only other 1xx http code is 103, which as we know is recommended for use only with http2 (that I can't use because I can't send 101 properly to upgrade the connection) So effectively there are no interim responses to send with this PR. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27069#issuecomment-3385903211
