On Mon, 24 Nov 2025 20:45:27 GMT, Volkan Yazici <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Add guards against `HttpHeaders::firstValueAsLong` failures. 
>> `H3MalformedResponseTest` is overhauled – migrated to JUnit, reinforced with 
>> exception type tests, etc. – but not all `firstValueAsLong` changes are 
>> verified with new additional tests. `test/jdk/java/net/httpclient/` tests 
>> still do pass.
>
> Volkan Yazici has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Address review remarks

src/java.net.http/share/classes/jdk/internal/net/http/Http1Response.java line 
338:

> 336:         // expect-continue reads headers and body twice.
> 337:         // if we reach here, we must reset the headersReader state.
> 338:         finally {

Is this `finally` necessary? The `ProtocolException` is supposed to kill the 
connection anyway, so its internal state shouldn't matter much.

If it does matter, please move the `finally` to the closing brace of the 
`catch`; it looks odd now.

src/java.net.http/share/classes/jdk/internal/net/http/MultiExchange.java line 
374:

> 372:         // Check `Transfer-Encoding`
> 373:         var transferEncoding = 
> headers.firstValue("Transfer-Encoding").orElse(null);
> 374:         if (transferEncoding != null) {

use `isPresent` instead of `orElse(null) != null`

src/java.net.http/share/classes/jdk/internal/net/http/Stream.java line 1822:

> 1820:     }
> 1821: 
> 1822:     private static int readStatusCode(HttpHeaders headers, String 
> errorPrefix) throws ProtocolException {

There's a similar piece of code for HTTP3 
[here](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/b491c9bc98a8da0a1d913e85673087e1b929cb3d/src/java.net.http/share/classes/jdk/internal/net/http/Http3Stream.java#L610-L624);
 do you think you could merge them?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28431#discussion_r2559547910
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28431#discussion_r2559710182
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28431#discussion_r2559813988

Reply via email to