On Wed, 31 Dec 2025 09:10:12 GMT, Daniel Jeliński <[email protected]> wrote:
>> That pattern is very common across many of these tests (62 sites). I can >> change them, but I wonder how much improvement like this is within the scope >> of this conversion effort. > > It could, but I'd let the next person handle that. JUnit can handle object > arrays just fine. No objection to leaving it for another day. There are few other improvements that could be made to these tests with a deeper pass. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28908#discussion_r2655070024
