On Tue, 30 Dec 2025 21:28:01 GMT, Josiah Noel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Let's get the base use case where we can implement it ourselves first. >> >> Sure, this would be handy in other cases as well >> >>> it seems exceedingly unlikely that something like that would happen due to >>> the extra maintenance required by the jdk team >> >> As mentioned this is already fully implemented in the http-client and as the >> protocol is quite symmetric for client/server it feels a bit wasted >> opportunity to not support it in the server part as well as the only thing >> needed is basically the upgrade part. > >> As mentioned this is already fully implemented in the http-client and as the >> protocol is quite symmetric for client/server it feels a bit wasted >> opportunity to not support it in the server part > > one step at a time, given all the other priorities, I anticipate that even > getting this functionality will take quite some time @SentryMan FYI https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29606 renamed `Event.WriteFinished` into `Event.ExchangeFinished` and the way to post the event is now to call `HttpExchangeImpl::postExchangeFinished(boolean writeFinished)`. See https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29606 for more details. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27989#issuecomment-3915819312
