>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:51:47 +0530 (IST), madanagopal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
madanagopal> If not is there any other way of achieving this or we madanagopal> have to write another MIB or trap which is same as the madanagopal> first but not containing those two objects? Write a definition which doesn't include objects C and D. The ones in the list are *required* but you can still add other ones to the trap if you want. IE, in one agent have it send just A and B, and in the other have it send all 4. This is perfectly legal. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. >From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
