>>>>> On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:02:28 +0100, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Dave> R 5.1.1 Dave> C 5.1.1+cvs 2004/06/01 Dave> R 5.1.2.pre1 Dave> C 5.1.2.pre1 2004/07/01 I don't think the reported version number as released by the tools should have anything other than things parsable by .s. IE, 5.1.1.cvs and 5.1.2.pre1.cvs should be the only style things we use. The reason being is that scripts are written that parse version numbers and stuff. I don't know if any exist, but it wouldn't surprise me. I've written some before, so I'm sure someone else has. IE: my preference would be to take the current version just released and auto-append a .cvs to the end. For new branches and the main line, we should tag it as version.pre0 or version.notyet0 or some other tag. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
