On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 17:40:08 -0700 Steve wrote: SF> I've just submitted a patch to deal with a portability issue [...] SF> SF> The short description is that the code now doesn't deal well with the SF> tm.tm_gmtoff struct member [...]
Hi Steve, It looks like Dave checked in your patch (or a version of it, anyway) to the main line cvs. Let us know if that doesn't fix the problem for ya. SF> Now to do the rest of the Unixware fixes :-( Don't forget to submit patches when you are done! :-) -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
