DS> The libwrap calls check against "snmpd" if there's an address string,
DS> but "snmp" it there isn't.   Is this difference intentional?  If so, why?

RS> I can't imagine why there would be a different check. John, any ideas?
 
JN>   Nah, looks like a typo to me -- sorry 'bout that!

That's what I suspected.
OK - I've fixed this on the main CVS line.

It does introduce a slight change in behaviour - should it go into
5.1.x and 5.0.x, or not?

Dave



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to