On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:54:38 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> RS> uint32_t, int32_t, uint64_t, int64_t. DS> RS> (There is intmax_t for the case when you simply DS> RS> want the largest available int type.) DS> DS> So I suggest that the configure script should check for the existance DS> of these types, and define them if they don't already exist. DS> (And/or define a suitable token to indicate if 64-bit types are not DS> supportable at all). DS> [...] DS> I'd suggest that we get this in place ASAP, DS> and then worry about how best to make use of it later.
Go for it! [ You were volunteering, weren't you? ;-) ] I think we can slip 5.2.pre1 a few days to get this in place... -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
