Thank you for your input.
Please let us know if there is anything else we can do
to make Net-SNMP work for your environment.

Best Regards,
-Mike Slifcak

> 
> From: "Fong Tsui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2004/10/14 Thu PM 07:54:40 EDT
> To: "Michael J. Slifcak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Get data using Tcp6
> 
> It works fine now.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Fong 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael J. Slifcak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> Please retry using net-snmp-5.2.pre2
> http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/net-snmp-5.2.pre2.tar.gz?dow
> nload
> 
> We've made some improvments, and would like your feedback.
> 
> Thank you!
> -Mike Slifcak, Net-SNMP project member
> 
> Fong Tsui wrote:
> > Correction:
> > It is
> > snmpwalk -c public tcp6:[fe80::2e0:81ff:fe25:8097]:161  ucdavis  --- 
> > Unknown host (Invalid argument)
> > 
> >     -----Original Message----- 
> >     From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of
> Fong Tsui 
> >     Sent: Mon 8/16/2004 2:10 PM 
> > 
> >     Hi, Robert,
> >     
> >     After I re-read your email, I think there are some confusion.
> >     The '[' ']' we were discussing refers that in fuction
> netsnmp_tcp6(udp6)_frmaddr(), not command line. Attached is my fix for
> netsnmp_tcp6(udp6)_frmaddr().
> >     
> >     
> >     The command line argument is different problem. That's tcp6
> doesn't work but udp6 works fine.
> >     snmpwalk -c public udp6:[fe80::2e0:81ff:fe25:8097]:161  ucdavis
> --- works
> >     snmpwalk -c public udp6:[fe80::2e0:81ff:fe25:8097]:161  ucdavis
> --- 
> > Unknown host (Invalid argument)
> >     
> >     And I launched snmpd on udp6:161,tcp6:161
> >     
> >     Thanks,
> >     
> >     Fong
> >     
> >     
> >     -----Original Message-----
> >     From: Robert Story (Coders) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 12:23 PM

> >     On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 19:08:25 -0700 Fong wrote:
> >     FT> snmpwalk -c public tcp6:[fe80::2e0:81ff:fe25:8097]:161
> ucdavis
> >     
> >     On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 19:15:15 -0700 Fong wrote:
> >     FT> I don't know why we need [' ']' there.
> >     
> >     I believe it is to allow for easier parsing. The delimiter is
> ':', and that works great for host name and IPv4 addresses. However, for
> IPv6 addresses, it gets messy, so the [] around IPv6 addresses makes
> parsing easier. They should be removed in the code before being passed
> to system calls like hosts_ctl.
> >     
> >     FT> Yes, I DO have some concern that the reason this  [' ']' is
> added at
> >     FT> the first place. Are they used somewhere else?
> >     
> >     No, I'm pretty sure once the command line has been parsed, the
> should 
> > be able to be discarded
> >     
> >     
> >     --
> >     Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
> >     Archive: 
> > <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
> >     
> >     You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all
> different.
> >     
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to