On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:32:23 -0700 (PDT) Michael wrote: MK> On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Robert Story wrote: MK> Well.. What I wound up doing was implementing delayed garbage collection MK> for the data contexts. The handler just tosses the pointer into a queue MK> to be deleted later (after agent_check_and_process() returns) while I MK> track pointers that have already been freed.
That works (as long as the table doesn't delegate requests). MK> But I consider it a bit of a kludge and would like to be able to tell my MK> client whether it's jus the way it's gotta be or if it's temporary due to MK> a bug. I'd vote it was a bug. Without a harder look at the code, though, I don't know how easy it would be to fix. If you see a way to fix it, I'd say there's a good change the patch would be accepted... -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
