Robert Story (Coders) wrote:
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 03:32:09 +0200 Geert wrote:
GDP> Don't know if it helps, but this specific problem can be solved by
GDP> replacing strtok with strtok_r.
GDP> Just to make sure I don't get reminded that a patch is better than an
GDP> email, you can take a look at patch 1040330 ;-)
GDP>
GDP> As mentioned in the patch record, possibly some platforms might not have
GDP> an strtok_r defined, however coding strtok_r is rather trivial.
I initially postponed this patch, thinking it wouldn't be useful until we
wanted to be multithreaded, but Geert made a prefectly valid point in the irc
channel: use of strtok in the library could interfere with an application's own
use of strtok. Now I'm thinking that we should go ahead and replace strok.
Have a BSD-like licensed strtok_r to use, in case a platform does not ?
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
