Dave Shield wrote:
I'm also a little uncomfortable about doing this with "snmpset" in particular.
Would it need to apply the same "all-or-nothing" behaviour as a single SET
request?
IMHO not, as this would add unnecessary complexity.
Or would it be acceptable for some requests to succeed, and others to fail?
If so, then the error reporting would need to be crafted very carefully.
Agreed.
Returning to the general concept, should this also support a "broadcast"
mode? - an idea that's mentioned at fairly regular intervals.
That's RFE 514528, for instance. Can be reasonable if used *carefully*.
Some tools/people don't, but should this stop us from implementing it?
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
