> > From: Robert Story (Coders) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2004/10/05 Tue AM 09:04:57 EDT > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Debian patches > > On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 03:34:44 -0400 Michael wrote: > MJS> >>16.Provide interesting sample configuration file > MJS> >> EXAMPLE.conf.def > MJS> >> Would be nice. Are these changes suitably licensed (BSD-like) ? > MJS> > Yes. > MJS> Coders, what do you think about changing the old.old example? > MJS> The patched one makes comments of the disk, exec, etc. lines, > MJS> and does some nice touches (imo) on the VACM lines. > > Does it look similar to what happens to a conf file if you run it through > snmpconf to auto-document? If so, I'd compare to the snmpconf output, and see > if there are enhancements to be incorporated there, and a suitable example > generated by snmpconf. I don't think we should ship and example that looks > different than what we generated (though we are probably already doing so). > > -- > Robert Story
I don't know, Robert. It looks more like EXAMPLE.conf, just different. I suspect you are right -- that file was probably not generated by snmpconf originally, or even recently. What WOULD be really cool is a library of configurations for specific uses. Think of it as clip art, but for Net-SNMP %^) -Mike Slifcak ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
