Wes Hardaker wrote:
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 10:15:54 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael J. Slifcak) said:
Michael> Is it OK to apply bug# 1040429 fixes to 5.1 patches and main branch ?
Most of the patch looks ok. I'm not really happy with the removal of
the NULL checks though. Why was that done?
I've changed the patch to leave the NULL checks intact.
In fact, I've made sure that all uses of the returned value
of transport->f_fmtaddr check for NULL first.
I did find the additional NULL set following SNMP_FREE in snmp_agent.c
aggregious and took the shot -- Don't worry folks! SNMP_FREE will
set addr_string to NULL in the example below
SNMP_FREE (addr_string)
addr_string = NULL <-- removed this
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
