>>>>> On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 15:45:03 +0100, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Dave> When I asked Wes about this, he said that he'd started by using the Dave> SNMP_ERR_xxx value as the return value from the function, and later Dave> moved to setting this in the request structure. Yep. I wanted separate errors per varbind, and by having one handler return an error for multiple varbinds it was too generic. Dave> When I worked through the code, I got the distinct impression Dave> that the return value was ignored completely. Yep. Though someday I think Robert is right. We should probably trap that error and treat it as a handler-level problem... You *SHOULD* set the error in the request, per standard method, and return SNMP_ERR_NOERROR! -- Wes Hardaker Sparta ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
