On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 07:30:15 -0400 Michael wrote:
MJS> I've behaved badly yesterday.  My apologies to all.

I wouldn't go that far. I think we all appreciate your effort in trying to
merge in vendor patches. It is a long overdue effort. And I know you are trying
to get as much into 5.2 as possible, which is also good. This is all good
behaviour.  I just had a technical issue with a particular solution. No
animosity should be implied!

-- 
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
<irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>

You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to