On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:58:53 -0500 Andy wrote:
AS> Robert Story (Coders) wrote:
AS> > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 07:38:33 -0500 Andy wrote:
AS> > AS> The MinGW build is broken by a call to the config_require() macro in 
AS> > AS> interface.h. It looks like if-mib/data_access/interface_ioctl is
AS> > AS> being required unconditionally, causing Windows builds with MinGW to
AS> > AS> fail.
AS> > 
AS> > Can you be a little more specific about the failure?
AS> > 
AS> > AS> The attached patch fixes the problem. Anyone opposed to this patch
AS> > AS> going in?
AS> > 
AS> > I assume that it compiles/links/runs ok with this patch?
AS> > 
AS> I withdrawal my proposed patch. It is causing problems in other places. 
AS> I am not sure why the MinGW build is failing now though, unless 
AS> something was changed.
AS> 
AS> if-mib/data_access/interface_ioctl.c:37: warning: "struct ifreq" 
AS> declared inside parameter list

If the ifreq structure isn't defined in mingw, and from my cursory googling it
isn't, then this patch is indeed the right thing to do, and I need to fix the
other problems it is causing. Send me the errors, or drop by irc tomorrow and
we can try and work it out.

-- 
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
<irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>

You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to