On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:08:52 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> OK, Robert - I think you've got the necessary backing to apply DS> this particular patch. (Unless Wes wants to wield a veto....)
Yes, I was actually holding on for his comment, since there is an outstanding objection. DS> I presume we're still on track for a 5.2.rc2 some time tomorrow? Last I heard. DS> It would probably be sensible to have this in before then, so we DS> can have the opportuntity for at least some field testing before DS> the final release. If it makes you feel any better, I did actually spend a bit of time testing this, and it went through a few revisions to get to where it is now... And I think there has been at least one 'it works' response to the patch... -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- This Newsletter Sponsored by: Macrovision For reliable Linux application installations, use the industry's leading setup authoring tool, InstallShield X. Learn more and evaluate today. http://clk.atdmt.com/MSI/go/ins0030000001msi/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
