On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:59:44 -0700 Srini wrote: SK> > SK> 2: portChannelTestString.0 (octet string) porttest SK> > SK> 3: portChannelTestString.1.1.19922944 (integer) 2 SK> > SK> > Are there any other files compiled into the agent? This looks SK> > like a table somewhere has registered an overlapping OID. The SK> > code you sent looked like it was registering the correct OIDs. SK> > SK> Yes. We have lots of mibs in the agent which are using the old ucd-snmp SK> style of SK> Coding. They are working fine. Now I am adding this mib with new style of SK> coding. SK> I know which handler is being called, but there is no reason why it must be SK> called. That mib code has been there for long time and working and is using SK> old style.
Ok, well I can't help you if you can't help me. Which handler is being called and returning the bad results? What style handler is it? SK> In our case we are using 5.1, so you suggest we use, scalar, iterate conf SK> files. Those, along with the dataset and array-user conf files, are more likely to be supported. There's nothing wrong with using the iterate_access conf files. If you look at them, compared to the iterate stuff, they aren't that much more complicated, and a reasonable proficient person already familiar with net-snmp could probably get buy just fine. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- This Newsletter Sponsored by: Macrovision For reliable Linux application installations, use the industry's leading setup authoring tool, InstallShield X. Learn more and evaluate today. http://clk.atdmt.com/MSI/go/ins0030000001msi/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
