[moved from users] On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 14:55:07 -0400 Robert wrote: RS> A recent bug-report laments that a sub-agent will crash on SIGPIPE. The RS> agent, snmpd, sets SIGPIPE to SIG_IGN. It seems like maybe a sub-agent RS> should do the same. RS> RS> I was thinking of moving the signal registration, for the signals which are RS> ignored, into on of the init routines. A new default store option would be RS> added to disable ignoring signals (unless anyone thinks the default should RS> be not to register the signals). RS> RS> Does that sound reasonable? It is a change in behavior for the agent RS> library, so I reckon that 5.3 would be the place to add it, rather than 5.2 RS> or earlier releases. Though there is a good argument for it, as it does RS> cause a crash for a not-unreasonable error condition.
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:58:41 -0700 Wes wrote: WH> Yes. Though this seems more like a -coders discussion... Ack, I thought I posted to coders. Oops. WH> I would argue it was a bug anyway so it'd be tempting to put it in 5.2.1 WH> or so if not 5.1.mumble. There is an open bug report, which is why I was asking. On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:57:53 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> Like what the man said. DS> I'd probably be a bit more hesitant about 5.1.x, DS> but it seems fine for 5.2.1. Hmmm.. why the difference between 5.1.x and 5.2.x? -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
