I solve my problem by adding SIZE in the front of InetAddress when displaying as index.
Thanks, Fong -----Original Message----- From: Robert Story (Coders) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 3:35 PM To: Fong Tsui Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problem to display OID (Index out of range) On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:59:21 -0800 Fong wrote: FT> I found the problem but don't know where to fix it. FT> Since NetAddress is defined as OCTET (0, 255), in FT> _add_strings_to_oid(), it is treated as TYPE_OCTETSTR. So, the first FT> OID of NetAddress is used as length of the string. That's why it is FT> error out with "Index out of range" if it is > 128. If NetAddress does not define a fixed length, and the table index does not use the IMPLIED keyword, then a length is required. FT> Is there any patch fixing this? If not, Where should I look into to FT> fix that? First we have to establish that the mib definition is valid and that there is actually a bug. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
