On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 13:21:55 -0800 Toth, wrote: TGS> # name incl/excl subtree mask(optional) TGS> view systemview included .1 TGS> # group context sec.model sec.level prefix read write TGS> notif TGS> access notConfigGroup "" any noauth exact all all TGS> all
As Jeff pointed out, the access view name should match the view name. I just wanted to add that specifying write access to a community name of public is not a good idea, unless you are on a secure and trusted network. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
