Any idea why do I still have problem with this? 

bgpRouteOrigin.ipv4.unicast.ipv4."10.0.96.254"."....".8 = INTEGER: igp(1)
bgpRouteOrigin.ipv6.unicast.ipv6."20:04:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:96:02:54"."0.)4............".96
= INTEGER: igp(1)

Now with last patch problem is only with displaying network address,
even address length is displayed correctly(8 and 96 in above
examples).
Also it will be good if we stay consistent in the way response is
displayed and the way user has to type query. But that is not a big
issue.

I hate having to use comercial version of similar tools that are
available only as binary for specific vendour OS. Will appreciate if
net-snmp fixes this soon.

Thanks much

- centrum

On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:49:21 -0800, Centrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What are the indexes and their types for this table?
> 
> INDEX:
> 
>         bgpRouteAfi                  InetAddressType,          ipv4 or ipv6
>         bgpRouteSafi                bgpSafi,
> unicast or multicast
>         bgpRoutePeerType        InetAddressType,           ipv4 or ipv6
>         bgpRoutePeer               InetAddress,                  peer
> IPv(4/6)address
>         bgpRouteAddrPrefix       NetworkAddress,            network address
>         bgpRouteAddrPrefixLen  Unsigned32,                   address length
> 
> InetAddress is of type iNetAddress and NetworkAddress are OCTET STRING
> (SIZE (0..255)) (this could have 0's in host field).
> 
> 
> - centrum
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:57:06 -0500, Coders Robert Story
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 00:07:07 -0800 Centrum wrote:
> > C> In following example second iNetAddress is for prefix and we do not
> > C> display that correctly:
> > C>
> > C> IPv4 Peer:
> > C> bgpRouteOrigin.ipv4.unicast.ipv4."10.0.96.254"."....".8 = INTEGER: igp(1)
> > C>
> > C> IPv6 Peer:
> > C> 
> > bgpRouteOrigin.ipv6.unicast.ipv6."20:04:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:96
> > C> :02:54"."0.)4............".96= INTEGER: igp(1)
> >
> > What are the indexes and their types for this table?
> >
> > --
> > Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
> > Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
> > Archive: 
> > <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
> >
> > You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
> >
>


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to