On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:02:35 +0000 Dave wrote: DS> > I thought comment changes were always fair game. And comments in DS> > mib2c conf files seems even safer. No? DS> DS> The mib2c conf file are less vital, agreed. But it's not true DS> that comment changes are fair game. What I'd suggested was that DS> it would be acceptable to update *standalone* documentation right DS> up to the last moment, but that any changes to code files should DS> be treated with more caution. Trying to protect against a lapse DS> in concentration (e.g. a broken comment) from screwing up a full DS> release.
Ah. Ok, point taken. I'll keep that in mind in the future. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
