On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:25:38 -0800 Wes wrote: WH> Robert> It came up in IRC. Someone wanted a read-only system that WH> Robert> couldn't turn into a read-write system if misconfigured. WH> WH> Or, um, intentionally configured it but he didn't want them to have WH> those privileges?
That too, I suppose. WH> I don't think it's in our best interest to work on that (IMHO, of WH> course) and is certainly not worth my company's resources. Did they WH> submit a patch? No, it was more of an offhand question. The 'alway fail vacm check' change was about a 4 line patch, and I thought it was useful, so I checked it in. Proper support (ifdef'ing set code to reduce footprint) was not done. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
