On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:10:40 -0800 Wes wrote: WH> 5.2 currently contains code to support the inetCidrRouteTable from the WH> IP-FORWARD-MIB. However, the updated mib isn't from an RFC yet though WH> it's in the RFC editor's queue to become one (IE, its done being WH> revised) and thus I think we should publish it with 5.2.1 since we WH> have code that implements part of it. Support? Objections?
The same issue applies to the new modules defined in the IP-MIB draft. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
