On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:05:44 +0100 Marcus wrote: MA> To solve this problem in a more permanent way, we wish to make the MA> SMUX-connector more asynchronious. We want to pass queries from the MA> management station to the SMUX peer as they are recieved and then call MA> some SMUX processing function from our main loop that takes care of both MA> traps from the SMUX peer and answers to queries.
The smux code doesn't get much attention, as AgentX is the preferred sub-agent protocol. I don't think it currently has an advocate or maintainer. I took a quick peek at it, and it is completely synchronous. This is probably becuase the code was written before there was any other way of doing things. What it should do is send the smux request, mark the snmp request as delegated, and return to the main loop. This allows the agent to process other tasks while waiting for a response. As I said, there is not current maintainer or advocate, so if you want any changes, you'll have to submit patches. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
