On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 20:10:02 +0530 (IST) madanagopal wrote: M> If [the response] has not come, i set "SNMP_ERR_NOSUCHNAME" to M> requests->status and unmark the request as delegated. But i get another M> request for the next registered mib tree. M> [...] M> when i don't delegate the request but still set "SNMP_ERR_NOSUCHNAME", the M> agent returns no such instance and doesn't generate another request for the M> next registered mib tree. Why is this inconsistent? I am using table handler M> in net-snmp version 5.1.
What kind of request is this? A get, or a getnext (walk)? Are you using the same handler in both cases? Are you using the table handler directly, or are you using code generated by mib2c? If it's mib2c code, which conf file did you use? -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
