RS> That should be fairly reliable. I think it would be a fairly extreme
RS> condition where a trap would be lost. Mainly, you'd have to make sure RS> your application read the traps fast enough, so that the buffer doesn't RS> get full. You would definitely want to look into the new socket buffer RS> size options to try and maximize them, reducing the chances of packets RS> being lost. I thought about using UNIX domain communication as well, but I'd rather not have to think about cleaning up a file and have problems if the wrong user owns the file (socket file), etc. I think I'll go with extending the UDP buffers for the socket. Thanks Robert. Sten ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
