On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 17:17, Philip Greer wrote:
> Hmmmm.... might be. But - what I am seeing is that those symbols
> are present within the libraries (for the most part) that are
> created during the compile. Doing a strings on the library
> ./.libs/libnetsnmpmibs.a and grepping for the functions
> (like netsnmp_arch_interface_init) I do see them in there.
Well, there will certainly be a *call* to this routine somewhere
in the code, so the string might well appear in the library due
to that. That doesn't necessary mean that there is a definition
of the routine.
How does the AIX compiler represent an unresolved routine
as compared to a resolved one in the library? What happens if
you grep for a routine that's known to be present?
(e.g. header_simple_table)
> Where would I find out more info on Robert's rewrite of IF-MIB
agent/mibgroup/if-mib
> and whether or not it truely ONLY is supported as compiled under
> Linux, or whether it is ported to other platforms (Solaris, AIX,
> HP-UX, etc.)
Somehow I doubt it has:
$ cd agent/mibgroup/if-mib/data_access/
$ find . -type f | xargs grep netsnmp_arch_interface_init
./interface_common.c:extern void netsnmp_arch_interface_init(void);
./interface_common.c: netsnmp_arch_interface_init();
./interface_linux.c:netsnmp_arch_interface_init(void)
Look very much like it's still Linux only.
Dave
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
