On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:57:33 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> That's my understanding, anyway - Robert may have a different take
DS> on things.
Nope, you hit the nail on the head.
DS> I seem to remember a brief discussion about which version of the
DS> IP-FORWARD-MIB we should ship - [...]
DS> The consensus was that the MIB file should match the more usual
DS> configuration - that it would simply cause more confusion if we
DS> shipped the unreleased version (most of which was irrelevant most
DS> of the time anyway).
DS>
DS> That may have been the wrong decision, but it made sense at the time.
DS> And I'm happy to stand by it.
Me too.
DS> I haven't checked Robert's code to see how it handles "obsolete"
DS> OIDs (e.g. the ipCidrRouteTable). But judging by past practise,
DS> I'd expect the agent to continue supporting them too - reporting
DS> the same information in various guises.
Right again.
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
