>>>>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:48:19 -0400, Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
WH> 2) does the current API allow for negative numbers in the API, or is WH> unsigned currently? I don't see a problem with negative numbers. WH> negative numbers for priority levels are actually quiet common in WH> API sets. unix-nice, iptables, etc all have negative numbers for WH> priority levels and it's common. Robert> It is an integer, so it would allow negative numbers. If it's Robert> common, then that might be an argument for just leaving it as Robert> is. That's probably what I'd do. There is no reason, IMHO, not to and in fact it helps compatibility... -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI. Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info, new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
