On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 18:45, Robert Story wrote: > I've run out of energy for this argument.
Most important thing first. I'm sorry if I've been pushing you too hard on this issue, Robert. I know how frustrating it can be when you're trying to explain something that seems so obviously right, and the person you're explaining it to just doesn't get the point. As usual, I've been coming to this having worked on That Bloody Book. That's probably part of the reason why I've been so reluctant to combine table_data2 and table_container. One of the exercises that I did was to look at each of the table helpers, and work out how to implement my standard test table using that helper. I don't *think* that my opposition is down to a reluctance to re-write this particular section (since I'm likely to do that two or three times more anyway!). But I can't honestly rule that out. I probably need to sit down and take a good long look at the two relevant examples - one based on the current table_container helper (illustrated by the mib2c.container.conf template), and one based on table_data. Sorry if I've been causing you too much stress. Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
