[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying
any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time
or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy.
Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn
and offer advice. Thanks. ]
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 09:14, jigar contractor wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. We are implementing subagent.
Yes - I realise that.
But why do you want to implement an (obsolete) SMUX subagent,
rather than a (newer, brighter, better, go-faster-stripes)
AgentX subagent?
Dave
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
