On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 09:36:29 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> You might be able to short-circuit this by tweaking the
DS> var_XXX() code, so that it updates the 'name' parameter
DS> to refer to the *last* column in the table.  But I'm not
DS> 100% sure that will necessarily work.

I think it would also qualify that handler as evil, as it isn't supposed to be
updating the name if it isn't handling the request...

-- 
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
      unless they are requests for paid consulting services.

Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>

You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.  How far can you shotput
a projector? How fast can you ride your desk chair down the office luge track?
If you want to score the big prize, get to know the little guy.  
Play to win an NEC 61" plasma display: http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to